Charles Plemons’ Blog

April 6, 2009

Twilight - A Vampire Tale

Filed under: Television and Film — charles.plemons @ 11:36 am

Okay, so there has been all this hype about Twilight, people asking if I’ve seen it, talking about how good it is, and so on. When my wife started mentioning wanting to watch it, I thought I’d have to check it out. So, we rented it.

If you would like to save the time of the rest of this review, I’ll sum in one word: T-E-R-R-I-B-L-E. It wasn’t until watching this movie that I realized how overdone the whiny, bitchy, love-struck male vampire is in media. It really started with Dracula, but then, he started it all really. But consider some of the latest vamps such as Angel from Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Mick St. John from Moonlight. Our society has taken the bite out of vampires! They are all becoming cry babies.

The worst by far though, is Edward Cullen from Twilight. Every scene he is on the verge of a crying fit. He sticks out his trembling lower lip, sulls up, and makes me want to stake him through the face! Not since Sesame Street have vampires been portrayed so ludicrously.

Really, the whole vampire in love with a woman thing is just about as silly as you or I falling in love with a chicken. You gaze longingly at the chicken, lay in the coop with it, stroking its feathers as it sleeps, trying to avoid temptation. Finally, when your will is weak, you lock lips to beak and pray you don’t slam that sucker into a deep frier and chow down KFC-style! Of course, you have to explain to the chicken the imminent danger. In fact, you tried to have a relationship with a cow some years back, and ole Bessy ended up steak, but that’s all in the past. This time, you won’t falter! At least not more than a nugget or two. I cannot help but think of movies like Rise or Blade, where you see what a horrendous mess vampire feeding can really be. For the sequel, let’s call Twilight what it really is, Romancing the Chicken.

At least characters like Angel got mad and broke things, and people, from time to time. He also had relapses into his bestial side, Angelus. Don’t forget when Spike “fell in love” with Buffy, it was still tainted by his vampire nature, and he even attempted to rape her. Vampires aren’t romantic figures, they are predators!

Back to Twilight. Even the “bad” vampires are not so bad. They have great lines like “you brought a snack” and “don’t play with your food”. Wow. Makes one want to shatter the kitchen chair, sharpen up one leg, and stake yourself right there in front of the TV.

Now, I can accept a PG-13 rated vampire movie, and I understand this film is for the romantic 13-year old teenie girls out there. That’s fine, but even at that, this movie is abysmal. The pacing is so S-L-O-W. Minute after minute of awkward silence, lip-trembling, and nothingness. Nothing. Nothing going on. The main characters just stare at each other, make a comment, and stare some more.

Let us not forget some of the riveting variations on the vampire legend. They seem to have venom instead of fangs, which is okay. Twilight isn’t the first to come up with this. My favorite though, is why they cannot go into sunlight. Sunlight makes them too sparkly! Yeah, they glitter like diamonds in the sunlight, so the MUST NOT BE SEEN. Slap on some blush and STFU.

This movie really made me cry tears of blood, mainly because I was clawing at my eyes. Do yourself a favor and pass on this one. If I prevent one poor soul from watching this film, I have been successful. The whiny boy-toy vampire who has lived for 200 years and still hasn’t grown a pair is old hat. Can we please, pretty please, come up with something new?

March 24, 2008

Halloween Revisited

Filed under: Television and Film — charles.plemons @ 10:48 am

Last night, I watched the new Halloween remade by director Rob Zombie. I’m a fan of Mr. Zombie’s music but not his films. Therefore, I was not expecting much from the new Halloween. Wow! Sometimes it is good to be wrong. The original is certainly a classic, but this may be even better. The film is bloodier than the original, but it is not over the top like the overwhelming majority of the horror crap of today. I particularly like how Michael Myers’ childhood was portrayed, giving you answers to the questions not addressed in the original.

I viewed the unrated version, which has many scenes that would offend (including a fairly brutal rape scene). I think the film did a particularly good job of portraying the moral decay and perversion of our normal, daily society and not just focusing on the psychotic Myers. In the early portions of the film, you almost have some sympathy for young Michael. By the end, however, the director has done a great job of shattering any attachments you could have for the character.

The movie stays very true to the original, with many scenes duplicated in homage. It was very cool to see familiar events with the added benefit of a higher budget and some background story to set the stage. I found it like watching an old favorite with new eyes and seeing it again for the first time.

In the end, the movie is no more socially redeeming than the original. The plot really boils down to a freakishly strong psychopath goes berserk and starts killing people. However, this is a strong representation of the genre and a carefully crafted retelling of a classic. I also liked how one of the characters was portrayed by an actress who starred in several of the middle films of the series. Well done, Mr. Zombie, well done.

December 12, 2007

Fido

Filed under: Television and Film — charles.plemons @ 11:09 pm

Fido is a heartwarming tale of a boy and his… zombie. I love the zombie genre, especially those along the vein of the original Night of the Living Dead. I don’t need the new era zombie movie’s buckets of gore; I’m looking for creative stories with a walking dead backdrop. Strange, I know, but it entertains me.

Fido is just the sort of film I’ve been looking for. It is a zombie film, but it adds a few twists, such as the setting (1950’s America) and plot (people have “domesticated” zombies). I think the film does a great job of posing interesting “what if” questions to the viewer. Some are answered, and some are left for you to ponder. In some ways it is like Leave It to Beaver, but it is done in such a tongue-in-cheek fashion that it is endearing, not annoying.

This film is much more fun to watch than Brain-Munching Dead People 17 or whatever the latest remake of a remake is these days. If you aren’t a big zombie genre fan, you can still watch this film without being completely grossed out—the film is violent, but not overly so. If you are a fan, this movie is a fresh idea on a decayed concept! By golly, go rent it today!

October 29, 2007

Motorola DCT 6412 III DVR

Filed under: Television and Film — charles.plemons @ 6:38 am

I had a strange problem with my Motorola DCT 6412 III DVR last night. Everything live on cable played through the tuner just fine, but nothing recorded would play. Instead it showed a black screen with no progress on the play bar. You could fast forward or rewind, and it remained at 0:00 played and a black screen.

I tried recording something new and then playing it, thinking maybe the old files corrupted. This resulted in the exact same behavior. Finally, I did some looking out on the Internet and noticed some things. First of all, Insight Communications has lousy self-help on their website. Really, it sucks. Second, there wasn’t a lot of help for troubleshooting to be found; most people seem to post questions trying to figure out how to steal TV shows off of the DVR.

After a bit of looking, I stumbled upon a single suggestion. Unplug the DVR for a while and it should work again. Eureka! That did, indeed, make the DVR start working again. I don’t know what caused the problem or if it will recur. I wanted to post about it here to get this information in one more place out on the web.

August 6, 2007

Release the Hounds!

Filed under: Television and Film — charles.plemons @ 6:26 am

The story broke this weekend regarding Dog the Bounty Hunter, and his “brother”, Tim, and son, Leland. All of the charges against them in Mexico have been dropped. The prosecution has until the 8th of August to refile, but it is yet to be seen if that will occur. Dog and family were wanted for the kidnapping of Andrew Luster, an heir to the Max Factor fortune who was wanted on numerous rape charges. Because there is no legal bounty hunting in Mexico, Dog and company were arrested after trying to get Luster across the border. Dog was released on bail and fled the country. Luster was turned over to American authorities and is serving 124 years in prison. Since there was no legal bounty hunting in Mexcio, Dog and family did not receive a penny of the $1 million reward for Luster’s capture.

Last year, Dog, Tim and Leland were arrested by American authorities and were awaiting extradition to Mexico. They were released on bail soon after the arrest. It appears the Mexicans have not attempted to press the issue to get Dog and family back to their courts.

Personally, I hope the charges remain dropped. I realize the Chapmans broke the law, but they put a sexual predator behind bars. Better what they did than having this guy running around. I think all of us are a little safer with Dog out on the streets catching criminals.

April 10, 2007

Thank God You’re Here

Filed under: Television and Film — charles.plemons @ 5:14 am

I’ve always been a fan of improv comedy. One of my favorite shows is Whose Line Is It Anyway? Last night, I caught two episodes of a new improv show, Thank God You’re Here. The premise is pretty good; several celebrities compete for an improv trophy. Each does a skit where they are put in a costume and walked onto a set. They have not seen the set and do not know what is going on. As they walk in, one of the “staff” actors says, “Thank God you’re here!” They then launch into an improv routine around whatever situation is going on. For example, Bryan Cranston competed on the first show and was dressed as a rock star and walked into a set where he had to perform his new hit song for a record label owner.

Overall, it is a good show. I think the pilot was better than the first episode of the season; the first episode had much more difficult sets to try and “get into”. Overall, worth watching!

January 29, 2007

Apocalypto

Filed under: Television and Film — charles.plemons @ 5:38 am

Remember when filmmakers had talent? Remember when filmmakers didn’t have to rely on shock and gore to try and engage the audience? Either Mel Gibson has no talent, or he prefers to ignore whatever talent he has. I certainly did not find this film to be “visceral” or “gripping” as some reviewers have found it. Instead, I found it a trite film trying to make a point which is lost in its violence and subtitles. There are times where the film is mildly entertaining, but in the end, it is a lemon.

January 21, 2007

Dragon Dynasty

Filed under: Television and Film — charles.plemons @ 10:00 pm

The Sci-Fi channel has been airing one of their made-for-TV films called Dragon Dynasty. Unlike the vast, vast, vast majority of Sci-Fi direct-to-crap films, this one is moderately entertaining. The special effects are pretty good, especially the dragons.

November 25, 2006

Latest Man vs. Wild

Filed under: Television and Film — charles.plemons @ 8:42 am

Bear is at it again this week, this time in the French Alps. If you have not seen this show yet, check it out. It is billed as “how you can survive”; that’s not really true. If I tried some of the things he’s capable of, I’d die. However, it is still highly entertaining to watch.

November 12, 2006

Man vs. Wild

Filed under: Television and Film — charles.plemons @ 9:31 am

Check out the new show on Discovery Channel, Man vs. Wild. It shows host Bear Grylls being dropped into remote locations around the world, and he shows you how to survive and escape. The first episode had him spend three days in the Moab desert, and by the end, he found civilization.

I thought the show very interesting. Most of the time, when he found an obstacle, he did what I would not have. I guess that means, I’d have died. Watch it sometime, it is a very interesting insight on survival tactics.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress